L&T shares jump 4% after Q4 profit rises 25% YoY to Rs 5,497 crore; order inflows hit record high
Revenue from operations for the March-ended quarter rose 11% to Rs 74,392 crore, up from Rs 67,079 crore in the corresponding period last year.
The board recommended a final dividend of Rs 34 per equity share for the financial year ended March 31, 2025. The record date for the dividend has been set as June 3, 2025.
For the full financial year, profit after tax (PAT) grew 15% to Rs 15,037 crore, compared to Rs 13,059 crore in FY24. Total revenue also rose 16% to Rs 2,55,734 crore from Rs 2,21,113 crore a year ago.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA) for Q4FY25 increased 13% to Rs 8,203 crore. EBITDA margin improved by 20 basis points to 11%, up from 10.8% in the same period last year.
L&T secured orders worth Rs 3,56,631 crore at the group level during the year ended March 31, 2025, registering an 18% YoY increase. Orders came from various geographies and segments such as renewables, transmission & distribution, airports, commercial and residential buildings, and metros, according to the company’s filing.International orders stood at Rs 2,07,478 crore during the year, accounting for 58% of the total order inflow.In the March quarter alone, L&T won orders worth Rs 89,613 crore, marking a 24% YoY rise. Of this, international orders made up Rs 62,739 crore, or 70% of the total.
Management Commentary Commenting on the results, Chairman and Managing Director S.N. Subrahmanyan said the year concluded on a high note for L&T, marking another period of “outstanding performance.” He added, “The company achieved its highest-ever annual order inflows. Similarly, the strong revenue growth underpins our journey towards achieving operational excellence through innovation and digitalisation.”
Also Read: GIFT Nifty signals gap-down start on escalating India-Pakistan tensions
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
Comments
Post a Comment